Science and Awareness: Twin Paths in the Breast Cancer Battle
(Photo by Louis McGill)
By Louis McGill, Andy Devine and Rob Larson
On her deathbed, a Peoria, Illinois, native named Susan Goodman Komen asked her sister, Nancy Goodman Brinker, to do everything possible to bring an end to breast cancer. Komen died, soon after, in 1980. She was only 33.
But that was over a quarter of a century ago. Since then, the disease that claimed Komen’s life has shot to the forefront of our national awareness, and the fight against it has gained much ground.
Breast cancer affects hundreds of thousands of American women every year. According to the Center for Disease Control, over 42,000 women in Illinois are diagnosed with breast cancer annually. Of those women, over 9,000—or 21 percent of those diagnosed—die from the disease.
Through the efforts of activists like Nancy Goodman Brinker, breast cancer charities have sprung up around the country. Some of the biggest, like Brinker’s Susan G. Komen for the Cure and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, are multi-million dollar organizations.
Through these organizations, the battle against breast cancer has gone down two separate paths, with some organizations focusing more on awareness and support services and some funneling money through grants to researchers.
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation delivered roughly $35 million to breast cancer research between 2008 and 2009. The group specializes in grants ranging from several thousand to several million to researchers.
There are also non-profits that dish out to both breast cancer research and awareness almost evenly. Susan G. Komen for the Cure—the largest breast cancer awareness group in the world—is an example of such an organization. From 2008 to 2009, Komen raked in almost $160 million in total revenue, pouring $73 million into research and $51 million towards education and awareness.
Finally, some breast cancer awareness/research organizations focus strictly on awareness, like the much smaller Breast Cancer Awareness Network for Strength. From 2008 to 2009, the Breast Cancer Network of Strength spent over $10 million on awareness, support, and education programs.
According to Dr. Ellen J. Benjamin, an expert on non-profit governance and fundraising, both are crucial in the struggle to prevent and ultimately solve the problem of breast cancer.
“Different people have different ideas and, in the pluralism of our independent sector, we get to float lots of them.” Benjamin said. “That means that one person will say research is important do that, and someone will say service is important do that, and some will say the root cause is the problem and do that.”
The approach of both informing the public and researching the cure appears to be working. The incidence rate of female breast cancer fell seven percent between 1999 and 2006 in Illinois, from 135.8 per 100,000 people to 125.6.
(click on maps to enlarge)
- Incidence rates in the United States are decreasing in most states. (Based on an analysis of CDC data by Louis McGill)
Death rates in the United States are decreasing in most states. (Based on an analysis of CDC data by Louis McGill)
According to Natalie Boden, the director for communication and public relations at the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, the solution lies in a balance between spreading the word and improving the science.
“Without a doubt,” Boden said, “research and awareness are both extremely important. There are many ways people can modify their behaviors to reduce their risk for cancer.”
The University of Chicago Hospitals is home to the university's Comprehensive Cancer Center. (Photo by Louis McGill)
According to Boden, these ways include quitting smoking, using sunscreen, eating right, knowing your family medical history, and getting regular cancer screenings. Information about breast cancer prevention is spread through awareness campaigns.
“Cancer is most curable when it is discovered early,” Boden said. “But when someone is diagnosed with cancer, it is the research that has provided the foundation for successful treatment.”
Research grants have allowed scientists to improve treatment, like the “overwhelmingly favorable results” discovered earlier this year at Cleveland Clinic’s Lerner Research Institute. Scientists at the institute believe they are close to procuring a breast cancer vaccine, but more testing is needed.
“Cancer is an extremely complex disease, and there is always a need for more funding.” Boden said. “While government agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and private organizations such as the American Cancer Society have been very generous in supporting our cancer researchers, our clinicians and scientists have many more promising ideas that are waiting to be funded.”
Police Suspect Lincoln Park’s 2009 Summer Muggings Likely Related
In the summer of 2009, seven muggings occurred throughout Chicago’s Lincoln Park neighborhood. Police are certain that five of the seven muggings are related, but they suspect that all seven are linked.
According to statements from the police, all the victims were men in their 20s and walking alone. Each was attacked from behind by four other men most likely in their 20s. Victims were asked for their wallets, then severely pummeled around the head and face. Two victims were hospitalized.
Here’s a map providing information on those muggings:
View Larger Map
Alex Morales-Aponte:The Fall and Rise of Pilsen
Alex Morales-Aponte talking about his passion: Pilsen. (Photo provided by Rima Thompson)
Pilsen has come a long way.
Just ask Alex Morales-Aponte of The Resurrection Project. Before this community organization took shape, the work that needed to be done in the Pilsen community—a dominantly hispanic neighborhood in the heart of Chicago—was too obvious. For too long, it had been a living example of a community without proper investment.
“Back then,” Morales-Aponte said, ”we had gangs, we had violence, and our infrastructure wasn’t being taken care of.”
Change didn’t occur overnight. But when six local churches organized and began fundraising in 1990, the collective called the Resurrection Project was born . The organization brought in funds from various places, even asking Mayor Daley for economic aid. Daley promised the community developers $2 million.
The dream was simple to imagine but overwhelmingly difficult to bring to fruition. The Resurrection Project hoped to clean up the street of Pilsen (both criminally and ecologically) and to provide good schools and decent, affordable housing for Pilsen residents. But this community organization wasn’t just building homes, it was buiding integrity within the communitry.
“We aren’t looking at brick and mortar, but human capital.” Morales-Aponte said. “We’re investing in people.”
Views from Gapers Block Founder Andrew Huff
Andrew Huff talking about Gapers Block (provided by Mike Reilley).
Some call it “gridlock,” “rubbernecking” or even a “lookie-loo.” But to Andrew Huff, traffic congestion will always be a “gapers block.”
Why? Because that is the name of Huff’s Chicago-centric website: Gapers Block. In 2003, Huff started the site with only 12 other Chicago-happy bloggers and a simple goal: to create a community blog for the city he loved. Now, with an audience of about 250,000 readers, his initial mission has been accomplished.
Anyone can launch a blog, but few—like Huff—have what it takes to make a Gapers Block. There is little reward…well, not in the form of hard currency anyways. Just ask Huff. Even though he’s the founder of Gapers Block, he still has other part-time gigs (like maintaining a site called thelobby.com) to help pay the bills.
But that’s the life of a blogger, and Huff has grown accustomed to it. According to the founder of Gapers Block, today’s standard going rate for a professional blogger is about $12 to $25 per post. Also, you have to keep in mind how enormous the blogosphere has grown in the past couple of years.
And Away We Go!
If there’s a tough racket these days, it’s journalism.
According to Vadim Lavrusik’s 8 Must-Have Traits of Tomorrow’s Journalist, 86,000 print-related workers were laid off last year. Good grief. So what does this mean for the world of journalism? Are we doomed to roam the Earth without the slightest idea of what’s happening in the world? Relax.
According to Lavrusik, mass media is in a transitional phase. Yes, we are moving away from tangible ink-and-paper print, but we are also heading towards a new frontier: the land of the internet. And how exactly should a would-be journalist prepare for embarkation into this relatively new and uncharted territory. Lavrusik has a few pointers… eight to be exact.
To summarize Lavrusik’s advice, the modern journalist needs to be three things: a journalist/programmer, an open-minded entrepreneur, and multi-skilled in all of today’s media tools (like blogging, podcasting and Twitter). And while Lavrusik’s list is accurate, it is still a bit incomplete. Besides being tech-savvy with tools like HTML, CSS and Javascript (mentioned in No. 2), it wouldn’t hurt for a present-day journalist to know a little something about RSS feeds.
Yes, there’s much occurring in modern media. Some bad (like “the great blogger-versus-reporter wars”, mentioned on Sean Blanda’s Blog), but some exciting and new.
Hello world!
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
